4. Mentoring Style

Does my mentoring style focus on structure or support?

The Mindset(s)

Authoritative mentoring blends two things at once:

  • Support: warmth, care, and responsiveness toward your mentees.
    • Survey item: “How important is it to you, as a mentor, to build good relationships with your mentees?”
  • Structure: clear routines, expectations, and follow-through.
    • Survey item: “How important is it to you, as a mentor, to set clear expectations for how your team works together?”

Polarity: Structure ↔︎ Support.

This chapter looks at structure and support through two lenses. Your dimensional preference comes from a 40-point budget, where valuing one more means valuing the other less, so it captures which way you lean. Your type comes from your rated skill on structure- and support-related mentoring competencies, which are measured independently, so you can be high or low on each.

Measures:

  • Mentoring Style Values Inventory (importance-rated; adapted from Ertesvåg, 2011). Eight items, four per subscale, rated 1–10 under a 40-point budget.
  • Mentoring Competency Assessment (Fleming et al., 2013), skill-rated 1–7. Selected items form an independent support-skill and structure-skill composite (see Your Type).

Your Dimensional Preference

Because the eight budget items share 40 points, Support and Structure trade off against each other: every point you add to one you take from the other, and the two always total 40. So this score is not “how much” of each you value in absolute terms, but which way you lean.

Use your password to find your score(s).

How your Preference is decided

Your Preference comes from comparing your two percentiles, not your raw point totals. If your Support percentile sits more than 20 points above your Structure percentile you are Support-leaning; more than 20 points below, Structure-leaning; within 20 points of each other, Balanced.

Raw points would be misleading. Almost everyone in this cohort spends more than half the 40-point budget on support, so judging against an even 20/20 split would call nearly everyone support-leaning — a fact about the items, not about you. Comparing percentiles asks the more useful question: which way you lean relative to your peers.

The two percentiles will always look like opposites, because Structure is 40 minus Support. That mirroring is arithmetic, not a finding about you.

4. Mentoring Style: your Support and Structure point totals (out of 40)
Password Support Support (%) Structure Structure (%) Preference
Drug Discovery
AR0518 21 12% (low) 19 71% (high) Structure-leaning
ES2006 21 12% (low) 19 71% (high) Structure-leaning
FR0313 22 33% (low) 18 54% (mid) Structure-leaning
IS2006 18 0% (low) 22 96% (high) Structure-leaning
IT1112 21 12% (low) 19 71% (high) Structure-leaning
JK0901 25 62% (mid) 15 38% (mid) Support-leaning
LC1234 26 67% (high) 14 21% (low) Support-leaning
NA1029 22 33% (low) 18 54% (mid) Structure-leaning
NK7306 26 67% (high) 14 21% (low) Support-leaning
PH0513 30 88% (high) 10 4% (low) Support-leaning
TO8721 30 88% (high) 10 4% (low) Support-leaning
Environmental Visualization
AD0517 21 12% (low) 19 71% (high) Structure-leaning
AS6699 26 67% (high) 14 21% (low) Support-leaning
DA0427 24 54% (mid) 16 42% (mid) Balanced
EL4269 23 50% (mid) 17 50% (mid) Balanced
GA0622 19 8% (low) 21 92% (high) Structure-leaning
NT4456 21 12% (low) 19 71% (high) Structure-leaning
SE1215 31 100% (high) 9 0% (low) Support-leaning
TS1234 28 83% (high) 12 17% (low) Support-leaning
Public Health
LD0904 18 0% (low) 22 96% (high) Structure-leaning
LE1709 22 33% (low) 18 54% (mid) Structure-leaning
LE8134 22 33% (low) 18 54% (mid) Structure-leaning
NH9122 24 54% (mid) 16 42% (mid) Balanced
NY1950 26 67% (high) 14 21% (low) Support-leaning
RE4743 30 88% (high) 10 4% (low) Support-leaning

Locate Your Preference

Locate your preference relative to other peer mentors! The axis is the points you placed on support (structure is 40 minus that): the far left is all structure, the far right is all support, and 20 is a balanced split.

Your Type

Structure and support are two dimensions that result in four mentoring styles. Neither dimension is “good” or “bad” on its own; it is the combination that describes how you show up as a mentor:

Low Support High Support
High Structure Authoritarian: high expectations, little warmth. Clear and demanding, but mentees may not feel safe asking for help. Authoritative: high expectations and high warmth. Clear structure that mentees experience as being on their side.
Low Structure Uninvolved: low on both. Mentees are largely left to themselves. Permissive: warm and caring, but loose on expectations. Mentees feel supported but may drift.

Unlike the budget above, your type comes from how skilled you feel at two independent sets of mentoring competencies (from the Mentoring Competency Assessment), so all four combinations are possible.

  • Support skill: assessing mentee knowledge, estimating mentee ability, enhancing mentee skills, and building confidence.
  • Structure skill: setting clear relationship expectations, aligning expectations, and helping establish work/life balance.
4. Mentoring Type: your MCA support- and structure-skill composites (1–7)
Password Support skill Support skill (%) Structure skill Structure skill (%) Type
Drug Discovery
AR0518 2.25 0% (low) 3.33 8% (low) Uninvolved
ES2006 4.50 58% (mid) 4.67 50% (mid) Authoritative
FR0313 6.00 96% (high) 7.00 92% (high) Authoritative
IS2006 5.00 75% (high) 4.33 33% (low) Permissive
IT1112 4.25 38% (mid) 4.67 50% (mid) Authoritative
JK0901 4.50 58% (mid) 3.67 17% (low) Permissive
LC1234 3.50 8% (low) 4.33 33% (low) Uninvolved
NA1029 7.00 100% (high) 7.00 92% (high) Authoritative
NK7306 4.25 38% (mid) 4.67 50% (mid) Authoritative
PH0513 4.00 21% (low) 4.33 33% (low) Uninvolved
TO8721 5.00 75% (high) 3.33 8% (low) Permissive
Environmental Visualization
AD0517 4.00 21% (low) 4.67 50% (mid) Authoritarian
AS6699 4.25 38% (mid) 3.67 17% (low) Permissive
DA0427 4.00 21% (low) 4.00 29% (low) Uninvolved
EL4269 4.25 38% (mid) 4.67 50% (mid) Authoritative
GA0622 5.50 88% (high) 7.00 92% (high) Authoritative
NT4456 5.00 75% (high) 6.33 88% (high) Authoritative
SE1215 3.25 4% (low) 2.67 4% (low) Uninvolved
TS1234 4.50 58% (mid) 5.67 83% (high) Authoritative
Public Health
LD0904 4.50 58% (mid) 4.67 50% (mid) Authoritative
LE1709 3.50 8% (low) 4.33 33% (low) Uninvolved
LE8134 5.75 92% (high) 5.33 79% (high) Authoritative
NH9122 4.25 38% (mid) 4.67 50% (mid) Authoritative
NY1950 4.00 21% (low) 3.67 17% (low) Uninvolved
RE4743 3.75 17% (low) 2.33 0% (low) Uninvolved

Each dot is one peer mentor. The dashed lines are the class medians on each skill, so “high” and “low” mean relative to your classmates. Find your Type in the table above, then find your quadrant.

Your type is a snapshot, not a fixed type

The median split means roughly a quarter of the class lands in each quadrant by construction. If you sit close to a dashed line, small changes in a few answers would move you. Each quadrant is a rough approximation of your balance between structure and support. This is not a fixed type! You can build skill on either dimension and move from one quadrant to another over time.

Reflect and Plan

Journal
  • Score: How does reflecting on your score help you think about who you are as a mentor?
  • Behavior: To be the best mentor you can be, what is one new thing you will try to do this week for mentees and/or your team?